Editorial policy
How LLMBites sources, reviews and explains its coverage.
Evidence before the hook
Reporting starts with identifiable sources: official announcements, documentation, repositories and research papers. We link to the evidence used, distinguish event dates from publication dates, and seek additional context when a claim is disputed or needs independent scrutiny.
A source’s claim stays attributed to that source. We do not describe something as independently verified or tested hands-on unless that work has actually been completed. Limitations, availability and costs belong in the story.
AI assistance and human responsibility
AI tools assist with research, drafting, code and illustrations. Reports are checked against the cited source material and disclose limitations and AI assistance. Berke Tekergül is responsible for publication decisions and corrections. AI output alone is not evidence, and source-based reporting is not described as hands-on testing or independent experimental reproduction.
Generated illustrations are labeled. They are not presented as documentary photographs or genuine product screenshots. Product imagery must be relevant, accurately credited and supported by a recorded basis for public use.
Corrections and updates
Send correction requests to [email protected] with the article address, the statement in question and supporting evidence. Requests are reviewed against the source material.
Substantive corrections are explained on the affected article. Meaningful updates receive an update date; routine design changes do not make an old announcement new.
Independence and commercial interests
Sponsorship, affiliate relationships and other material commercial interests must be disclosed where they are relevant. Paid promotion must be clearly distinguishable from independent editorial coverage.
A company’s appearance in a story does not imply a partnership or endorsement of LLMBites.